POPI – Mary Poppins More Like

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Everybody knows about POPI, the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013. Most people will probably think of it in a generally positive light. But it does have a downside, almost humorously so. 

True story. The author of this article was sent the minutes of the Annual General Meeting for a non-profit company of which he is a member. When it came to the record of attendance at the meeting the page was almost blank except for a note that said, paraphrasing, “the record of the members attending has been omitted in terms of the POPI Act.” What? That’s nonsense. Since when do you have a meeting of the members of a company registered in terms of the Companies Act and you do not note those in attendance? No problem thought the author. The POPI Act falls under the auspices of the Information Regulator. As luck had it the author had a meeting very close to the Information Regulators’ offices. Just pop in and get them to verify. Very nice and helpful lot. But what they said sounded straight out of Mary Poppins. You know, the London lady who can fly with the use of an umbrella. [S11] notes that personal information can only be collected under certain conditions. “Personal Information” is defined as information relating to an identifiable, living natural person………” So if they record Malcolm as attending the meeting it is no problem as Malcolm is not identifiable – there are lots of them. Malcolm Larsen is now different. Malcolm Larsen is now identifiable. So according to the Regulator the minutes of the meeting were correct in terms of the POPI Act. 

Mary Poppins was more believable than this! So, I asked the staff of the Regulator if, by the same reasoning, the same would apply to a directors meeting of the same company. They affirmed in the positive. So, you have a situation where the minutes of a meeting would note “ a certain person said this” “another person disagreed”. No organisation would, or should, allow such loose governance.

How would you work your way around this? [S11(1)a] allows for the processing of the information if the data subject consents to the processing. Before a meeting starts – get consent. Or buy an umbrella.

Related Posts

Law

Lights, Camera – no Action!

No this is not Hollywood, this is you on the roads in South Africa. You are either driving along listening to the music in a car and suddenly a police officer jumps out at you and you know you have just been caught in a speed trap. Gone through a red light and see that flash behind you – oops! Never fear because the Prosecuting Guidelines for Speed Measuring Equipment and Traffic Light Violation Monitoring Equipment is here to protect you. This has been issued by the Technical Committee for Standards and Procedures for Traffic Control and Traffic Control Equipment, We refer to version 1.5 issued February 2012. We believe that this is still in force. The object of the guidelines is to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurement results for fair prosecution. The decision whether or not to prosecute however still remains in the discretion of the prosecutor.  The operator of any Speed Measuring Equipment (SME) shall be a traffic officer appointed in terms of the road traffic legislation; and be in possession of an operator’s certificate for the specific type of SME.  An accredited laboratory -shall calibrate or verify all speed measuring equipment and all time or

Read More
Latest news

Running your Company – Removing Employees

If you run your own company it may happen that you have a desire, for whatever reason to dismiss an employee. No problem, just tell them to pack their bags and but come back. Sorry, it is not as easy as that. Human rights and all that jazz. Whilst this article is written from the employer point of view, obviously the reverse applies to the employee. So, you have entered into a contract of employment with your employee. The terms for dismissal are noted in this contract and they are in alignment with the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997. [37] states that, Notice of termination of employment 37. ( 1 ) Subject to section 38, a contract of employment terminable at the instance of  a party to the contract may be terminated only on notice of not less than— (a) one week. if the employee has been employed for four weeks or less: (b) two weeks. if the employee has been employed for more than four weeks but not more than one year: (c) four weeks, if the employee—  (i) has been employed for one year or more: or (ii) is a farm worker or domestic worker

Read More